| Zao 的个人资料Something,,,照片日志列表 | 帮助 |
|
2007/12/19 网络社交工具调查清华大学人机交互实验室--网络社交工具调查 2007/12/16 拿到了白纸一张的课表选课就自己选帮别人选了一堆二外 日语2 3 德语2 法语1 比较搞笑的是还帮五字班选了物流管理概论 原因是系里为了控制大家一窝蜂去物流方向的热情 bobo的这门课容量只有30 谁抽上了谁才能去物流方向 现在的局面就是五字班八仙过海各显神通 目前行情是容量30的课余量-53 大概有略高于1/3的概率抽中 预计中签率在明天收盘前还会有小幅下降 分个方向居然要用抽签解决 不知道系里是不是觉得当初还不如不分 其实我挺想不通为什么大家如此热爱物流方向的 这架势IE系可以改名LE了 Logistics Eng. 难道真是因为说自己学工业工程没人知道 说学的是物流就OK了? 2007/12/10 被CHI2008光荣reject没有做学术的天分 我还是老老实实读个master工作去吧 不过顶级会议就是顶级会议啊 acceptance rate只有18% p.s.有一个审稿人居然还很认真的指出了我几个语法错误,,, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Zao Fan, Thank you very much for submitting to CHI 2008 Notes. We are sorry to tell you that we are not able to include your Notes submission, 145, Personality Need Factors and Social Web Service, in the conference program. We received 340 submissions and were able to accept 18% of them, which required making difficult choices and rejecting several submissions that were highly rated by some of their reviewers. The decisions as to which submissions to accept were made after careful reviews by a number of highly qualified professionals around the world. At the end of this message are the reviews for your submission. We hope these will be useful to you. If you submitted a rebuttal to the reviews, be assured that it was read by a member of the program committee. We appreciate your participation in the research community and look forward to future submissions of your work. ------------------------ Paper 145, Review 1 ------------------------ Overall Rating 3 (3 - Possibly reject: This seems below the line, but I'm not deadset against it. ) ------------------------ Paper 145, Review 2 ------------------------ Overall Rating 2 (Reject: I would argue for rejecting this paper.) ------------------------ Paper 145, Review 3 ------------------------ 4 (Borderline: Overall I would not argue for accepting or rejecting this paper.) |
|
|